bv2.co.uk

Unfortunately about 36hours ago the Hard Drive in my web server decided to end its little spinning life. Although the site has been restored from a couple of backups some of the file download links are not working.

The files are still available but I need to fix the download links - please be patient

For anyone running download monitor out there, the newer update changed the DB table names. Don’t do what I did or rather didn’t….  and forget to change the SQL backup scripts to reflect these changes.

I just got an email update from PC Design Lab regarding their new case. Those of you who follow the blog will know my ComputeCube machine is built into their QMicro2 case, which has been really good with only one or two tiny niggles. Although in fairness they are caused by the the amount of power cables and the heat emitted by the Asus rampage 2 gene northbridge arrangement and the Tesla C1060.

The new case looks good and their have adopted the suggestions from their clients. You may have a look at the new pre-order case here.  Even though they have raised the cage I would have liked it to be slightly taller to help with airflow over the GPU’s and power cable routing.  Strangely they mention it can now support 750w power supplies, but I have been running a 1250w one in the older case for a while now with no problems.

The radiator bracket is a really good idea and would have helped sort out the Rampage 2 Genes overheating northbridge rather nicely.

If you are looking for a SFF case in my opinion there is nothing better out there and this new model raises the bar even further.  Now if I could only get my hands on the new one and a watercooling kit

While ordering a replacement power supply for one of my machines I decided to add a Windows 7 to the shopping cart.

This was in no small part prompted by the NVidia parallel nsight addin for visual studio which would not work on my XP machines. An additional contributing factor was the lack of SP3 for Windows XP Pro x64. Of course the new office 2010 will only run on XP SP3, Vista and Windows 7.

Having had a brief and scary encounter with Windows Vista I am pleasantly surprised with the new version of Windows.  Microsoft have done a good job with this one.

The installation process had to be a “clean” one as there is no upgrade path from winXP x64. I took a full backup of my “ComputeCube” machine and without bothering to format the C drive just popped the DVD in and rebooted.

(more…)

Yes….. I sold out.   There is now a google adwords space on the top right on the sidebar and at the bottom of individual posts.  I went for what I think is the most unobtrusive design they offered.

Google have emailed me adwords related stuff for ages and I have resolutely resisted as this site is in no way a marketing site. However, in the last few months the site and related equipment failures (power supply, hard drive, mail server etc) have cost me quite a bit and hopefully this will help me recoup some of that.

Looking at what they seem to be placing as ads on the pages I have been starting to wonder how good their contextual advertising is… still it’s early days.

In related site news the forums are now permanently removed, although there are still some links left over as I write this.  With the amount of spam / hacking etc its just not worth maintaining a forum on a small site like this.

Nearly 3 months since my last post

Work has been exceptionally busy: In the last two months on top of my normal product maintenance and improvement duties I have prepared and filed a patent application, architected and largely completed a distributed, resilient document processing framework and found a bit of time to eat and sleep!

I’ve noticed other blogs in the raytracing / graphics / visualization space have been very quiet lately - maybe everyone else is also working like crazy?

Not a huge amount has happened in my raytracer and SPH projects although got some interesting effects running with a non-uniform mass particle system when I had time over Christmas. Screenshots soon.

I do have the beta release of Nexus (the NVidia Visual Studio plugin)  but sadly it only runs on Windows Vista or Windows 7 which leads nicely on to my next point:

I am a bit irritated with Microsoft for two reasons:  Even though I purchased a 64 bit Windows XP professional about 6 or 8 months ago there is no upgrade path to Windows 7…  Secondly even though visual studio 2008 standard has a switch for openMP it doesnt contain the openmp headers. Only the more expensive professional version does. Not something that was immediately obvious from the documentation before I purchased…

Although I also run Linux (centos) I prefer to develop on a Windows GUI - less buggy and more responsive than gnome / kde in my opinion. For running code the Linux os does usually win though! I would really like to run Nexus so am a bit stuck about what to do….  Succumb and buy Windows 7 and get Nexus on Visual Studio? or just forget entirely about Windows development / environment and use Linux / gcc / Intel compilers instead?  While the Intel compilers are great (if a bit expensive) for an IDE I really do like Visual Studio.  Most of my code is cross platform and for graphics I mostly use openGL so could switch without too much trouble…    But direct compute is so tempting…..

Arrrrgh what to do!

I noticed this linked from both Atom and Real-time Rendering blogs. Cyril Crassin, the guy behind the amazing gigavoxels raytracing, has got a 3d Mandelbrot fractal rendering in real time.

As we know there isn’t actually a 3rd dimension to the imaginary plane so some manipulation is required. The chap who discovered a good way of transforming it to 3d ( the Mandelbulb ) has a website which you can find here. Well worth reading and some pretty amazing images!

As a side note: I’ve owned the book: “Real-time Rendering” for a number of years now and it is an invaluable resource. The Real-time Rendering blog mentioned above is the blog by the authors of the book.

A few months ago I made a post mentioning how I don’t conform to the Amdahl’s law way of thinking but never went into any details.

The law describes the speedup that can be obtained if you can parallelize a section of your problem. The speedup that can be obtained is described by the following equation:

Where P is the proportion of the problem that can be parallelized / sped up and S is the speedup amount.

Assuming that S->infinity  then P/S -> 0  this leave us with

This implies that no matter how many processors / speed improvements we make to the P portion of the problem we can never do better than     And the biggest % improvement from the baseline comes with low values of S (or relatively low numbers of parallel processors). This result is observed in the field time and again. Very seldom does throwing more than 4 or 8 processors at a problem speed it up any more than the large gains you get from the first 2 or 4 processors.

This equation does expand with multiple P and associated S terms in order to describe a more complex / lengthly problem: (P1+P2+P3 = 100%)

Certain problems where P is large do respond well to the increase in processors these are known as “embarrassingly parallel”, ray tracing is rather a good example of this.

So why do I not agree with this if the equation makes sense?

The assumption that only P areas can be accelerated by S and strung together in a serial fashion is rather simplistic.

Why do we have to finish P1 before beginning P2?  Even if the P2 area has dependancies on P1 its rare to have the entire section of P2 to depend on a single result (of course there are cases - reduction kernels etc)

Maybe P3 can overlap P1 and P2, some may benefit by having more processors while others may reach an optimal at two. Why not overlap the sections and supply them with their optimal processing power? This is easy to achieve with Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAG’s) and can even be computed on the “fly” although they do get rather large!

Quoting Amdahl’s law as a reason why no further speed benefits are available in a system is really just showing that thinking is still stuck in serial mode with little bursts of parallelism thrown in.  Lets starting thinking parallel in all areas and make the most of all available compute resources.

I’ve just completed reading the white paper released by nvidia which you can find here.

Rather interestingly no mention of graphics performance has been made which, in a way, is really exciting. This has clearly been aimed at the high performance or throughput computing markets with the notable inclusion of ECC memory and increased double precision throughput along with the updated IEEE 754-2008 floating point support.

Concurrent kernel execution and faster context switching will allow, with the use of DAG’s, the optimization of execution on the devices rather than just working out the most efficient order of kernels to execute sequentially.

Also tucked away in the white paper is the mention of have predication at the instruction level which should give greater control of divergent paths in your kernels.

The inclusion of C++ support will appeal to a lot of people but am I rather unconvinced this is the correct way to go for throughput computing as it will encourage the use of all the old patterns that may work well in serial cases but are often rather poor for enabling maximum throughput.

There is a lot more in the paper and already an announcement by Oak Ridge that they will be using it in a new supercomputer.

All in all its a wonderful development and I can’t help feeling that computing took a substantial leap forward today.

Yes I am still alive… :)    I’ve been exceptionally busy at work lately, not complaining though as work pays the bills and gpu / compute things are just a hobby.

What I do find rather frustrating is in the limited time I have to maintain the blog, it all gets eaten up by wading through mountains of spam. Akismet does a fantastic job, but on the forums side the bot detection captcha is pathetic and I have around 100 signups / 100’s of messages to check every day. So until a later date when I can fix / upgrade it I will be suspending the forums from today.

On a rather more positive note:  Nvidia has announced OptiX ray tracing engine. Some examples are out already so worth having a look at.  Nvidia has also announced Nexus which looks incredible. I have heard that they may charge for it but with the features it apparently has I would be willing to pay.

For some of the latest conferences papers and pre-prints have a look at Ke-Sen Huang’s page which he keeps updated with some really nice stuff.

As for me - no new cuda / compute development for a while. When I get a few mins free I’m tending to work on the maths for the stuff I want to do but never get enough time to implement anymore. Hopefully this will change in 2 or 3 months once work settles down a bit. On the subject of work there have been one or two questions over email and on the blog of the steps taken after an edge detector has been applied - unfortunately I cannot answer this as it gets a bit close to what I do for work (OCR and document processing). Rather interesting one of my ray tracing acceleration algorithms which turned out pathetically for its purpose has been rather good at identifying features in 2d/3d images but more on this at a later date once its a bit more complete.

My little blog is officially one year old today!

Over the last year I’ve made many more posts than I was originally planning to make and judging by the number of subscribers and variety of institutions and people who visit it’s not entirely all rubbish, or so I like to tell myself.

Ongoing projects that will hopefully get completely or improved in the coming year are:

Thermal monitor - networking coming soon

More raytracing (of course) - linking PhysX to it (thanks to Timothy’s post here for inspiration) to improve on my rather primitive bouncing balls.

SPH and Lattice methods for fluid simulation

Sorting algorithms - I haven’t posted much on this lately but some decent results so far

Massive Data set processing.

Anything else that grabs my interest